Individual Detail
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
8 |
0 |
20 |
4.00 |
0.00 |
80 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
55 |
GWU |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
VCU |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
0.00 |
65 |
Temple |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
55 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
| Total |
9.0 |
51 |
4 |
180 |
2.72 |
0.00 |
490 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
GWU |
1.0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
| Total |
10.0 |
20 |
6 |
200 |
0.85 |
0.00 |
170 |
Chris, Maryland A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
5.00 |
0.00 |
100 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
55 |
GWU |
1.0 |
9 |
2 |
20 |
4.00 |
0.00 |
80 |
VCU |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
0.00 |
65 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
9 |
1 |
20 |
4.25 |
0.00 |
85 |
Temple |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
0.00 |
65 |
| Total |
10.0 |
69 |
11 |
200 |
3.17 |
0.00 |
635 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Ian, William and Mary B
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
6.0 |
2 |
0 |
120 |
0.17 |
0.00 |
20 |
Claire, William and Mary B
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
GWU |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
Whitman |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
5 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
| Total |
7.5 |
11 |
4 |
150 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
90 |
Alex, William and Mary B
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
GWU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
6.0 |
2 |
0 |
120 |
0.17 |
0.00 |
20 |
Lauren, William and Mary B
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
GWU |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Whitman |
0.5 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
10 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
6.5 |
10 |
1 |
130 |
0.73 |
0.00 |
95 |
Luke, William and Mary B
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
GWU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
| Total |
6.0 |
4 |
1 |
120 |
0.29 |
0.00 |
35 |
Rob, Delaware
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
GWU |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
22 |
6 |
200 |
0.95 |
0.00 |
190 |
Josh, Delaware
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
GWU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
2 |
1 |
200 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
15 |
Mark, Delaware
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Temple |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
GWU |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
VCU |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
| Total |
10.0 |
31 |
12 |
200 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
250 |
Greg, Delaware
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
GWU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
8 |
2 |
200 |
0.35 |
0.00 |
70 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
1 |
1 |
200 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
5 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Delaware |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
0.00 |
65 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
6 |
2 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
5.00 |
0.00 |
100 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
5.00 |
0.00 |
100 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
3.75 |
0.00 |
75 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
8 |
0 |
20 |
4.00 |
0.00 |
80 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
6 |
2 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
3 |
3 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
| Total |
10.0 |
72 |
11 |
200 |
3.33 |
0.00 |
665 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
| Total |
10.0 |
12 |
2 |
200 |
0.55 |
0.00 |
110 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
1 |
1 |
200 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
5 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
2 |
0 |
200 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
VCU |
1.0 |
11 |
2 |
20 |
5.00 |
0.00 |
100 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
12 |
1 |
20 |
5.75 |
0.00 |
115 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
14 |
0 |
20 |
7.00 |
0.00 |
140 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
11 |
4 |
20 |
4.50 |
0.00 |
90 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
3.75 |
0.00 |
75 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
11 |
2 |
20 |
5.00 |
0.00 |
100 |
Temple |
1.0 |
7 |
5 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
3.75 |
0.00 |
75 |
Temple |
1.0 |
10 |
3 |
20 |
4.25 |
0.00 |
85 |
| Total |
10.0 |
100 |
21 |
200 |
4.47 |
0.00 |
895 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
3.0 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
3.0 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
15 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
6 |
3 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
GWU |
1.0 |
9 |
1 |
20 |
4.25 |
0.00 |
85 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
5 |
3 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
3.75 |
0.00 |
75 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
3.75 |
0.00 |
75 |
| Total |
10.0 |
60 |
10 |
200 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
550 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
GWU |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
4 |
3 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
| Total |
10.0 |
33 |
10 |
200 |
1.40 |
0.00 |
280 |
Jha, Whitman
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
8 |
0 |
20 |
4.00 |
0.00 |
80 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
VCU |
1.0 |
10 |
2 |
20 |
4.50 |
0.00 |
90 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
10 |
1 |
20 |
4.75 |
0.00 |
95 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
8 |
3 |
20 |
3.25 |
0.00 |
65 |
GWU |
1.0 |
9 |
1 |
20 |
4.25 |
0.00 |
85 |
| Total |
7.0 |
55 |
12 |
140 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
490 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
GWU |
1.0 |
4 |
4 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
7.0 |
29 |
6 |
140 |
1.86 |
0.00 |
260 |
Jeremy, Rutgers Newark
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
GWU |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
| Total |
10.0 |
22 |
3 |
200 |
1.02 |
0.00 |
205 |
Shah, Rutgers Newark
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Whitman |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
6 |
3 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
VCU |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
GWU |
1.0 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
VCU |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
6 |
3 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
| Total |
10.0 |
46 |
14 |
200 |
1.95 |
0.00 |
390 |
Jason, Rutgers Newark
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
GWU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
0 |
1 |
200 |
-0.03 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Andria, Rutgers Newark
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
GWU |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
| Total |
10.0 |
4 |
3 |
200 |
0.12 |
0.00 |
25 |
Glenn, Maryland B
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
7.0 |
6 |
0 |
140 |
0.43 |
0.00 |
60 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
2 |
5 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Temple |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
| Total |
7.0 |
22 |
10 |
140 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
170 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
7.0 |
7 |
0 |
140 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
7.0 |
0 |
0 |
140 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
George, William & Mary A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
| Total |
8.0 |
16 |
2 |
160 |
0.94 |
0.00 |
150 |
Ellen, William & Mary A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
0.00 |
-10 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
| Total |
8.0 |
16 |
8 |
160 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
120 |
Brian, William & Mary A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Temple |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
8.0 |
14 |
5 |
160 |
0.72 |
0.00 |
115 |
Matt, William & Mary A
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
8.0 |
16 |
8 |
160 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
120 |
Jeremy, Rutgers NB / Princeton
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Temple |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Temple |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
10.0 |
36 |
2 |
200 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
350 |
Mason, Rutgers NB / Princeton
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
5 |
1 |
20 |
2.25 |
0.00 |
45 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
55 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Temple |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
10.0 |
36 |
8 |
200 |
1.60 |
0.00 |
320 |
John, Rutgers NB / Princeton
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
10.0 |
16 |
1 |
200 |
0.78 |
0.00 |
155 |
Guy, Rutgers NB / Princeton
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
An Inconvenient Fruit |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Temple |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
25 |
1 |
200 |
1.23 |
0.00 |
245 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
5 |
2 |
200 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
40 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
70 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Temple |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
VCU |
1.0 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
50 |
| Total |
10.0 |
35 |
5 |
200 |
1.62 |
0.00 |
325 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
-0.50 |
0.00 |
-10 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Temple |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
10.0 |
7 |
7 |
200 |
0.17 |
0.00 |
35 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Rutgers NB / Princeton |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland B |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Maryland C |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
William & Mary A |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Temple |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
55 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
10.0 |
30 |
4 |
200 |
1.40 |
0.00 |
280 |
Brian, Carnegie Mellon
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
GWU |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Temple |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
20 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
35 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
VCU |
1.0 |
1 |
3 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
GWU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
| Total |
8.0 |
16 |
9 |
160 |
0.72 |
0.00 |
115 |
Trevor, Carnegie Mellon
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
GWU |
1.0 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
3.25 |
0.00 |
65 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Temple |
1.0 |
1 |
3 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
4 |
2 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
VCU |
1.0 |
6 |
1 |
20 |
2.75 |
0.00 |
55 |
GWU |
1.0 |
10 |
4 |
20 |
4.00 |
0.00 |
80 |
| Total |
8.0 |
40 |
14 |
160 |
2.06 |
0.00 |
330 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
40 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
5 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
| Total |
8.0 |
12 |
7 |
160 |
0.53 |
0.00 |
85 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
15 |
VCU |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
-5 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
30 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
25 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Total |
8.0 |
15 |
3 |
160 |
0.84 |
0.00 |
135 |
| Opponent |
GP |
10 |
-5 |
TUH |
P/TU |
P/N |
Pts |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Delaware |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
William and Mary B |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
VCU |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Maryland A |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
Rutgers Newark |
1.0 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
20 |
Whitman |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
Carnegie Mellon |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
10 |
| Total |
8.0 |
8 |
0 |
160 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
80 |